Determinan Perilaku Keselamatan Kerja: Peran Faktor Personal Penjamah Makanan di Warung Lesehan Malioboro
Abstract
Safety behavior has become a vital factor in reducing and even preventing work accidents. Although many studies have examined safety behavior and the factors that influence it, including personal and situational factors, the study is limited to formal industries with high risk. Besides, empirically individual elements have been shown to have a more significant influence on safety behavior. Therefore, this study aims to describe the safety behavior and the personal factors that influence it, which include the safety knowledge, safety attitudes, and safety motivation of food handlers at Warung Lesehan Malioboro. This study involved randomly 110 food handlers at Warung Lesehan Malioboro. Collecting data in this study used a questionnaire technique to measure the safety knowledge, safety attitudes, safety motivations, and safety behaviors of food handlers. Data analysis used descriptive statistics, t-test, F-test, and coefficient of determination (adjusted R2). These study findings showed that the description of the factors of safety knowledge, safety attitudes, safety motivations, and safety behaviors of food handlers with good enough quality. Also, partially, the safety knowledge, safety attitudes, and safety motivation were proven to influence the work safety behavior of food handlers. Simultaneously, the factors of safety knowledge, safety attitudes, and safety motivation also affect the work safety behavior of food handlers. The contribution of these three determinant factors had an influence of 66% on the work safety behavior of food handlers at Warung Lesehan Malioboro.
Keywords : safety motivation, safety knowledge, safety behavior, sefety attitude
ABSTRAK
Perilaku keselamatan telah menjadi faktor vital untuk mengurangi dan bahkan mencegah terjadinya kecelakaan kerja. Meskipun telah banyak studi yang mengkaji perilaku keselamatan dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya yang meliputi faktor personal dan situasional, namun studi tersebut terbatas pada industri formal dengan resiko yang tinggi. Selain itu, secara empiris faktor personal terbukti memiliki pengaruh yang lebih besar pada pembentukan perilaku keselamatan. Oleh karena itu, studi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran perilaku keselamatan dan faktor personal yang mempengaruhinya yang meliputi pengetahuan, sikap, dan motivasi keselamatan para penjamah makanan di Warung Lesehan Malioboro. Studi ini melibatkan secara acak 110 penjamah makanan di Warung Lesehan Malioboro. Pengumpulan data dalam studi ini menggunakan teknik keusioner untuk mengukur pengetahuan, sikap, motivasi, dan perilaku keselamatan penjamah makanan. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif, uji t, uji F, dan koefisien determinsi (Adjusted R2). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa gambaran faktor pengetahuan, sikap, motivasi, dan perilaku keselamatan para penjamah makanan berketgori cukup baik. Selain itu, secara parsial faktor pengetahuan, sikap, dan motivasi keselamatan terbukti mempengaruhi perilaku keselamatan kerja para penjamah makanan. Secara simultan, faktor pengetahuan, sikap, dan motivasi juga mempengaruhi perilaku keselamatan kerja para penjamah makanan. Kontribusi ketiga faktor determinan yang terdiri dari pengetahuan, sikap, dan motivasi memberikan pengaruh sebesar 66% terhadap perilaku keselamatan kerja para penjamah makanan di Warung Lesehan Malioboro.
Kata kunci : motivasi keselamatan, pengetahuan keselamatan, perilaku keselamatan, sikap keselamatan
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
S. Buchanan et al., “Occupational injury disparities in the US hotel industry,” Am. J. Ind. Med., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2010.
International Labour Organization, Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Sarana untuk Produktivitas (Pedoman Pelatihan untuk Manajer dan Pekerja). Jakarta: International Labour Office, 2013.
M. T. Newaz, P. Davis, M. Jefferies, and M. Pillay, “The psychological contract: A missing link between safety climate and safety behaviour on construction sites,” Saf. Sci., vol. 112, pp. 9–17, 2019.
P. Zhang, N. Li, Z. Jiang, D. Fang, and C. J. Anumba, “An agent-based modeling approach for understanding the effect of worker-management interactions on construction workers’ safety-related behaviors,” Autom. Constr., vol. 97, pp. 29–43, 2019.
B. H. W. Guo, T. W. Yiu, and V. A. González, “Predicting safety behavior in the construction industry: Development and test of an integrative model,” Saf. Sci., vol. 84, pp. 1–11, 2016.
F. Guennoc, C. Chauvin, and J.-C. Le Coze, “The activities of occupational health and safety specialists in a high-risk industry,” Saf. Sci., vol. 112, pp. 71–80, 2019.
T. K. Courtney, Y. H. Huang, S. K. Verma, W. R. Chang, K. W. Li, and A. J. Filiaggi, “Factors influencing restaurant worker perception of floor slipperiness,” J. Occup. Environ. Hyg., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 592–598, 2006.
HSE, “A recipe for safety: Health and safety in food and drink manufacture,” 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/hsg252.htm. [Accessed: 11-Dec-2018].
ILO, “Restaurants – ILO Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety,” 2011. .
R. W. Lent et al., “The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 474–483, 2001.
A. Silla and V.-P. Kallberg, “Effect of railway safety education on the safety knowledge and behaviour intention of schoolchildren,” Eval. Program Plann., vol. 55, pp. 9–16, 2016.
C. Wang, C. Xu, J. Xia, and Z. Qian, “The effects of safety knowledge and psychological factors on self-reported risky driving behaviors including group violations for e-bike riders in China,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 56, pp. 344–353, 2018.
F. Kalua, “The Relationship between Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Ofcare Givers and Food Hygiene in Day Care Centers,” Technikon Pretoria, 2001.
W. Ko, “The relationship among food safety knowledge , attitudes and self-reported HACCP practices in restaurant employees,” Food Control, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 192–197, 2013.
A. Hedlund, K. Gummesson, A. Rydell, and I. Andersson, “Safety motivation at work : Evaluation of changes from six interventions,” Saf. Sci., vol. 82, pp. 155–163, 2016.
D. N. Maulidhasari, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Berbahaya (Unsafe Act) Pada Bagian Unit Intake PT.Indonesia Power Unit Bisnis Pembangkitan (UBP) Semarang,” Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, 2011.
S. Notoatmodjo, Pendidikan Dan Perilaku Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2003.
B. Endroyo, “Faktor-faktor yang berperan terhadap peningkatan sikap keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (k3) para pelaku jasa konstruksi di semarang,” J. Tek. Sipil dan Perenc. UNNES, vol. 12, no. 1993, pp. 111–120, 2010.
S. P. Robbins, T. A. Judge, B. Millet, and M. Boyle, Organisational Behavior, 7th ed. Australia: Pearson Education, 2013.
R. M. Choudry, D. Fang, and H. Lingard, “Measuring Safety Climate of a Construction Company,” 2009.
M. N. Vinodkumar and M. Bhasi, “Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2082–2093, 2010.
K. Dartey-Baah, “Job satisfaction and motivation: Understanding its impact on employee commitment and organisational performance,” Acad. Leadersh., vol. 8, no. 4, 2010.
S. Notoatmodjo, Ilmu Perilaku Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014.
A. Neal and M. A. Griffin, “A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 946–953, 2006.
D. P. Shin, H. S. Gwak, and D. E. Lee, “Modeling the predictors of safety behavior in construction workers,” Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 298–311, 2015.
C. Chen and S. Chen, “Measuring the effects of Safety Management System practices , morality leadership and self-efficacy on pilots ’ safety behaviors : Safety motivation as a mediator,” Saf. Sci., vol. 62, pp. 376–385, 2014.
E. Hafrida, “Kuesioner penelitian pengaruh faktor personal dan manajemen K3 terhadap tindakan tidak aman pada pekerja di PT. Inti Benua Perkasatama Dumai,” Repos. Institusi Sumatera Utara, 2015.
I. Mohammadfam, F. Ghasemi, O. Kalatpour, and A. Moghimbeigi, “Constructing a Bayesian network model for improving safety behavior of employees at workplaces,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 58, pp. 35–47, 2017.
M. A. Griffin and A. Neal, “Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation.,” J. Occup. Health Psychol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 347–358, Jul. 2000.
G. Sax, Principles of education and psychological measurement and evaluation, 2nd editio. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1980.
J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective, 7th. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010.
I. Ghozali, Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 19. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2011.
P. G. Schrader and K. A. Lawless, “The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviors approach: How to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments,” Perform. Improv., vol. 43, pp. 8–15, 2004.
S. Notoatmodjo, Promosi Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku. Rineka Cipta, 2007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32487/jst.v5i2.677
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 JST (Jurnal Sains Terapan)