Chatbot Adoption in Indonesian Banking: Exploring the Roles of Trust and Corporate Reputation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32487/jshp.v10i1.2800Keywords:
Chatbot, Digital Banking, Artificial Intelligence (AI), TAM, Trust, Corporate ReputationAbstract
The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed the financial services sector, particularly in banking. One of the most widely adopted applications is the chatbot, which enables banks to deliver faster, more efficient, and responsive customer service through automated interactions. Despite its growing implementation, public acceptance of chatbot technology remains varied. Users tend to evaluate these systems not only based on how useful or easy they are to use, but also on how much they trust the system and the organization behind it. This study explores the factors that drive users’ behavioral intention to use banking chatbots by modifying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to incorporate trust in the chatbot system and corporate reputation. The model incorporates perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, trust in chatbot, and corporate reputation. Data were gathered through an online survey involving 111 respondents who had prior experience using banking chatbot services. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), reveal that perceived ease of use significantly predicts perceived usefulness, while corporate reputation strongly influences trust. Furthermore, both perceived usefulness and trust are found to be significant predictors of behavioral intention to use banking chatbots. Trust also exerts a notable effect on perceived usefulness. These findings suggest that fostering user trust and managing institutional reputation are critical in promoting the sustainable adoption of AI-driven financial technologies. Banks are encouraged to focus not only on improving the technical features of chatbot systems but also on strengthening their credibility and transparency to enhance user confidence and perceived utilityReferences
Abdallah, W., Harraf, A., Mosusa, O., & Sartawi, A. (2023). Investigating Factors Impacting Customer Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: Banking Sector of Kuwait. International Journal of Applied Research in Management and Economics, 5(4), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijarme.v5i4.961
Ahmed, E., & Ward, R. (2016). A comparison of competing technology acceptance models to explore personal, academic and professional portfolio acceptance behaviour. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0058-1
Aji, B. J. P. S., Masnita, Y., & Kurniawati. (2023). The Influence of Chatbot Anthropomorphism on Trust, Intention, and Engagement of Indonesian State-Owned Bank Customers: Investigation Using the DOI Theory. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.35313/ijabr.v5i02.293
Anaya, L., Braizat, A., & Al-Ani, R. (2024). Implementing AI-based Chatbot: Benefits and Challenges. In: Procedia Computer Science. Elsevier B.V.
antaranews. (2024). OJK catat indeks literasi keuangan di perbankan capai 64,05 persen. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4240703/ojk-catat-indeks-literasi-keuangan-di-perbankan-capai-6405-persen
Cheng, E. W. L. (2019). Choosing between the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9598-6
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Doherty, D., & Curran, K. (2019). Chatbots for online banking services. Web Intelligence, 17(4), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.3233/WEB-190422
Eren, B. A. (2021). Determinants of customer satisfaction in chatbot use: evidence from a banking application in Turkey. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(2), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2020-0056
Flavián, C., GuinalÃu, M., & Torres, E. (2005). The influence of corporate image on consumer trust: A comparative analysis in traditional versus internet banking. In Internet Research (Vol. 15, Issue 4, pp. 447–470). https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510615191
Gemihartono, I. (2024). Analysis of Personal Data Preservation Policy in Utilizing AI-Based Chatbot Applications in Indonesia. Medium: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Islam Riau, 12, 63–78.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks. In Sage.
Li, D., Liu, C., & Xie, L. (2022). How do consumers engage with proactive service robots? The roles of interaction orientation and corporate reputation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(11), 3962–3981. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2021-1284
Mahury, R. A., & Arief, N. N. (2024). The Factors Affecting Continuance Intention of ChatGPT as An AI Chatbot in Indonesia. Social Science Studies, 4(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.47153/sss42.8472024
Mei, H., Bodog, S. A., & Badulescu, D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Sustainable Banking Services: The Critical Role of Technological Literacy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208934
Nguyen, Y. T. H., Tapanainen, T., & Nguyen, H. T. T. (2022). Reputation and its consequences in Fintech services: the case of mobile banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(7), 1364–1397. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2021-0371
OJK. (2022). Survei Nasional Literasi dan Inklusi Keuangan (SNLIK).
Oyeniyi, L. D., Ugochukwu, C. E., & Mhlongo, N. Z. (2024). Implementing AI in banking customer service: A review of current trends and future applications. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(2), 1492–1509. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.2.0639
Patil, K. P., Kulkarni, M. S., & Hudnurkar, M. (2024). Enhancing service quality in the insurance industry with AI-powered humanoid chatbots. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2023-0354
Rahman, M. M., Lesch, M. F., Horrey, W. J., & Strawderman, L. (2017). Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 108(June), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.011
Rahman, M., Ming, T. H., Baigh, T. A., & Sarker, M. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in banking services: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(10), 4270–4300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2020-0724
Ramadhani, D. R., Birawa, M. S., Sholikah, D. S., & Prabandanu, R. M. A. A. H. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Berbasis Chatbot Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Dalam Transaksi Online Dengan Objek Aplikasi Shopee. Journal of Exploratory Dynamic Problems, 1(3), 104–115.
Rejali, S., Aghabayk, K., Esmaeli, S., & Shiwakoti, N. (2023). Comparison of technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to assess a priori acceptance of fully automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 168(January 2021), 103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.103565
Richad, R., Vivensius, V., Sfenrianto, S., & Kaburuan, E. R. (2019). Analysis Of Factors Influencing Millennial’s Technology Acceptance Of Chatbot In The Banking Industry In Indonesia. International Journal of Management (IJM), 10(3), 107–118. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp107http://www.iaeme.com/ijm/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=10&IType=3JournalImpactFactor
Rondan-Cataluña, F. J., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & RamÃrez-Correa, P. E. (2015). A comparison of the different versions of popular technology acceptance models a non-linear perspective. Kybernetes, 44(5), 788–805. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2014-0184
Sanny, L., Susastra, A. C., Roberts, C., & Yusramdaleni, R. (2020). The analysis of customer satisfaction factors which influence chatbot acceptance in Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 10(6), 1225–1232. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.036
Sheth, J. N., Jain, V., Roy, G., & Chakraborty, A. (2022). AI-driven banking services: the next frontier for a personalised experience in the emerging market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(6), 1248–1271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2021-0449
Siahaan, M. (2024). Willingness to use chatbots Indonesia 2023, by type of activity. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1493374/indonesia-willingness-to-use-chatbots-by-activity-type/
Silitonga, F., & Isbah, M. F. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work in the Indonesian Public Sector. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 12(2), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v12i2.62297
Škerháková, V., Ali Taha, V., Tirpák, D., & Kráľ, Š. (2022). Perception of Corporate Reputation in the Era of Digitization: Case Study of Online Shopping Behavior on Young Consumers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114302
Sundjaja, A. M., Utomo, P., & Colline, F. (2024). The determinant factors of continuance use of customer service chatbot in Indonesia e-commerce: extended expectation confirmation theory. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2024-0137
Thormundsson, B. (2024). Global spending on AI 2023, by industry. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1446052/worldwide-spending-on-ai-by-industry/
Wiliam, A., Sasmoko, Prabowo, H., Hamsal, M., Indrianti, Y., & Princes, E. (2019). Analysis of E-Service Chatbot and Satisfaction of Banking Customers in Indonesia. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 4 (3)(2), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050032001
Yanti, E., Mardhiah, A., Tia Novita, P., Ardilla, A., & Hijri Khana, F. (2024). Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AI CHATBOTS IN INDONESIAN PUBLIC HOSPITALS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES. https://medalionjournal.com/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of JSHP right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to scopy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).














