EVALUASI KINERJA ANGKUTAN KOTA BERDASARKAN KUANTITAS PELAYANAN DI KOTA BALIKPAPAN
Abstract
EVALUATION OF URBAN TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE BASED ON QUANTITY SERVICE IN BALIKPAPAN
Ownership of private vehicles is increasing while urban transport has decreased the number of passengers. The decline of urban transport’s passengers make imbalance between demand supply. There are several factors that influence the decreasing of public interest in using urban transportation, one of them is the level of service provided still lacking. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the operational performance and services to formulate recommendations related to urban transport performance improvement. The method for this research use calculation of public transportation performance analysis and index of accessibility. The value of accessibility urban transport in Balikpapan is moderate with a value of 4 in the downtown area while low accessibility with a value of 3 is in the suburbs. This proves that urban transport is not easy to reach by the community. The condition of load factor, availability of transportation and infrastructure is a variable of low value so that it can be an evaluation material. The value of load factor for urban transport to the outskirts is very high reaching 98% on route 8 and 57% on route 7 is not proportional to the availability of urban transport where based on the evaluation results are still less where the percentage of transport that operates less than 80% each unit time circulation.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alhadar, A. “Analisis Kinerja Jalan Dalam Upaya Mengatasi Kemacetan Lalu Lintas Pada Ruas Simpang Bersinyal Di Kota Palu”. Jurnal SMARTek Volume 9 (2011).
Aminah, S. “Transportasi Publik dan Aksesibilitas Masyarakat Perkotaan Transportasi Publik dan Aksesibilitas Masyarakat Perkotaan”.Surabaya (2007): Universitas Airlangga.
Bapeda Balikpapan. “Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Balikpapan Tahun 2012 2032”. Balikpapan (2012): Badan PerencanaanWilayahKotaBalikpapan.
Basuki, I. “Pengembangan Indikator dan Tolok Ukur Untuk Evaluasi Kinerja Angkutan Umum Perkotaan”. Yogyakarta (2012):Universitas Gajah Mada.
BPS Balikpapan. “Kota Balikpapan Dalam Angka 2017”. Balikpapan (2017): Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Balikpapan.
BPS Kaltim.“Banyaknya Kendaraan Bermotor Menurut Kabupaten/Kota di Kalimantan Timur Tahun 2012 – 2015”. Samarinda (2016) : BadanStatistik Kalimantan Timur.
Cresswell, J. W. “Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran”. Yogyakarta (2016): Pustaka Pelajar.
Dirjen Perhub Darat. “Pedoman Teknis Penyelenggaraan Angkutan Penumpang Umum di Wilayah Perkotaan dalam Trayek Tetap dan Teratur”. Jakarta (2002): KementerianPerhubungan Republik Indonesia.
Rahman, M. A. “Teori Segitiga Ekonomi:
Teori Fundamental Ekonom”. Yogyakarta (2016): Garudhawacana.
Shen J, Li W. “Discrete Hopfield neural networks (DHNN) for Evaluation Service Quality of Public Transit”. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering (2014) Vol.9, No.2 p.331-340.
Tamin. “Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi”. Bandung (2000): Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Warpani, S. “Merencanakan Sistem Perangkutan”. Bandung (1990): Penerbit ITB.
Warpani, S. P. “Pengelolaan Lalulintas
dan Angkutan Jalan”. Bandung (2002): Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.